Land redistribution modeling over the course of spatial planning for the development of green infrastructure in rural territorial communities of Ukraine

Digital technologies for Agricultural and Spatial Territory Planning

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Olena Malashevska Ph.D. o_malashevska [at] nubip.edu.ua National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Mykola Malashevskyi Ph.D. mykola.malashevskyi [at] gmail.com The National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Andrey Tarnopolskyi No andrey0037 [at] gmail.com The National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Yevhen Tarnopolskyi Ph.D. zeka0037 [at] gmail.com The National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Mariia Sytnyk No mariasytnyk4 [at] gmail.com The National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First published on this website: 02.07.2026 - 06:43
Abstract 

The development of green infrastructure (GI) is an important component of the sustainable development of rural communities in Ukraine, ensuring adaptation to climate change and realizing the potential of decentralization. The issue of its development is topical due to the degradation of 57% of the country's territory due to water and wind erosion, as well as anthropogenic pressure and destruction of ecosystems due to warfare. The main obstacle to the development of GI is the difficulty of allocating plots within the already formed private property. The mathematical modeling of systemic land redistribution as the main tool for overcoming the existing barriers is in the focus of the study. The formation of a "land reserve" by involving the escheated inheritance and non-recalled land shares is predefined by the project. The key economic lever of the proposed model is ensuring the equivalence or increase in the value of private owners' assets after the exchange or redemption of plots, which minimizes social conflicts and guarantees compliance with property rights. Testing of the model in Petrivska community of Kyiv region confirmed its high efficiency: the area of ​​green zones increased by 1,084,352 m². The research findings proved the need to transition from sporadic greening to systematic network planning. The proposed methodology is a universal and effective tool for communities in Ukraine, allowing the development of green spaces in the conditions of free land shortage and fragmented private land ownership.

References 

Petrivtsi Village Council. (2025). Community Development Strategy for 2025–2035. Petrivtsi Village Council. https://petrivtsi-rada.gov.ua/dokumenti_strategichnogo_planuvannya/strategiya_rozvitku_gromadi_na_2025_2035_roki

European Commission. (2013). Green Infrastructure (GI) — Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital (COM/2013/0249 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52013DC0249

Király, É., Illés, G., & Borovics, A. (2025). Green infrastructure for climate change mitigation: Assessment of carbon sequestration and storage in the urban forests of Budapest, Hungary. Urban Science, 9(4), 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9040137

leBrasseur, R. (2023). Citizen sensing within urban greenspaces: Exploring human wellbeing interactions in deprived communities of Glasgow. Land, 12(7), 1391. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12071391

Malashevskyi, M., & Malashevska, O. (2021a). The aims and trends of the sustainable land tenure formation in Ukraine: the spatial aspect. Geodesy and Cartography, 47(3), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2021.12791

Malashevskyi, M., & Malashevska, O. (2021b). The swapping approach in the course of land consolidation: Case study of Ukraine. Geodesy and Cartography, 47(4), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2021.13214

Malashevskyi, M., & Malashevska, O. (2025). Concept of the development and rehabilitation of green infrastructure for territorial communities of Ukraine. Sustainability, 17(24), 11106. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411106

Murkin, K., Shiode, N., Shiode, S., & Kidd, D. (2023). Biodiversity and the recreational value of green infrastructure in England. Sustainability, 15(4), 2915. https://doi.org/10.3390/s15042915

Salomaa, A., Paloniemi, R., Kotiaho, J. S., Kettunen, M., Apostolopoulou, E., & Cent, J. (2016). Can green infrastructure help to conserve biodiversity? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(2), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654416641974

Skokanova, H., Netopil, P., Havlíček, M., & Šarapatka, B. (2020). The role of traditional agricultural landscape structures in changes to green infrastructure connectivity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 302, 107071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107071

Sohn, W., Bae, J., & Newman, G. (2021). Green infrastructure for coastal flood protection: The longitudinal impacts of green infrastructure patterns on flood damage. Applied Geography, 135, 102565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102565

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2019). On the Key Principles (Strategy) of the State Environmental Policy of Ukraine for the Period till 2030 (Law No. 2697-VIII). The Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada, 16.