Master

War Damage Assessment and Post-War Reconstruction
There is a newer version of this article available
Newer version Date Published
New version of a paper 1 27.08.2026 - 10:26
Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Daniil Korniienko No danyakornienko2003 [at] gmail.com Institute of Geological Scinces NAS of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Iryna Kolianina Ph.D. kolira_igns [at] i.ua Institute of Geological Scinces NAS of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Ihor Romaniuk No romaniuk [at] hydrosafe.kiev.ua Institute of Geological Scinces NAS of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First published on this website: 26.08.2026 - 16:27
Abstract 

Data on the chemical composition of groundwater in aquifers within the Neogene and Paleogene deposits of the Kakhovka Reservoir region were collected and analyzed to assess the impact of natural and anthropogenic factors on their chemical composition. Spatial analysis identified three general zones with varying levels of mineralization and well yield. The first zone (mineralization of 2,000–6,000 mg/dm³, yields up to 100 m³/day) is located within the Ukrainian Shield in the Dnipropetrovsk region and partly in the Zaporizhzhia region. The second zone covers the far south of the study area – the lower Dnieper River basin in the Kherson region (predominantly fresh water, though right-bank mineralization reaches 2,000–2,500 mg/dm³, with yields of 200–1,200 m³/day). Increased mineralization in specific wells in this area stems from the inflow of highly mineralized water driven by intensive abstraction far from the Dnieper River, and seawater intrusion in coastal wells near the Black Sea. The third zone serves as a transition zone between the first and second zones, featuring mineralization of up to 1,500 mg/dm³ (occasionally exceeding 2,000 mg/dm³). Yields range from 100 to 300 m³/day, and can exceed 500 m³/day along the banks of the Dnieper River. The impact of well abstraction intensifies toward the south.

References 

1 Kapinos, M. M., Kolodysta, V. L., Vorobiova, Ye. I., Puhach, S. L., Bilokopytova, N. A., & Davydova, V. S. (1977). Report on the regional assessment of groundwater reserves of the Black Sea Artesian Basin (Ukrainian part). Dnipropetrovsk. (in russian) 2. Gursky, D. S., & Kruglov, S. S. (Eds.). (2007). Tectonic Map of Ukraine at a Scale of 1:1,000,000. Explanatory Note. Part I. Kyiv: UkrDGRI, pp. 18–22. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://geology.lnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/3.-TK-Ukrainy-Zapy... (in Ukrainian) 3. Kosharna S., Korniіenko D. (2026). The state and quality of groundwater within the Kak(hovka reservoir area in the context of regional water supply system transformation. У: Proceedings of the XIX International Scientific Conference “Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment” (20–24 april 2026., Kyiv, Ukraine). 4. Goshovsky, S., Sanina, I., and Lyuta, N. (2018). Identification and Delimitation of Groundwater Bodies in the Dnieper River Basin, Ukraine, 117 pp. [Electronic resource]. – Available at: https://www.euwipluseast.eu/images/2019/04/GWB-Delineation-DNIPRO_UA_fin... (in Ukrainian) 5. Shestopalov, V.M., Lyuty, G.G., and Sanina, I.V. (2019). Modern Approaches to Hydrogeological Zoning in Ukraine. Mineral Resources of Ukraine. pp. 3–12. [Electronic resource]. – Available at: https://mru-journal.com.ua/index.php/mru/article/view/29 (in Ukrainian) 6. . Kosharna, S. K. (2023). Environmental Risk Assessment. Kyiv: Kyiv University Publishing Center, 212 pp. [Electronic resource]. – Available at:geol.univ.kiev.ua (in Ukrainian)

Comments

Даня Корнієнко
Даня Корнієнко's picture
researcher

Sorry, I didn't include the title of the article.
How can I fix this?

AttachmentSize
korniienkogeoterrace-2026.pdf1.46 MB
Thu, 08/27/2026 - 10:26