Web Application for Pipeline Hazard Assessment based on Google Earth Engine: Case Study of Ukrainian Carpathians

GIS Technologies and AI for Decision-Making and Management

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Artem Andreiev Ph.D. artem.a.andreev [at] gmail.com State Institution “Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”
Kyiv, Ukraine
Olga Titarenko Ph.D. olgatitarenko [at] casre.kiev.ua State Institution “Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”
Kyiv, Ukraine
Anna Kozlova Ph.D. ak.koann [at] gmail.com State Institution “Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”
Kyiv, Ukraine
Tamara Dudar Sc.D. dtv.nau [at] gmail.com State University “Kyiv Aviation Institute”
Kyiv, Ukraine
Denys Malyi No denis.malyi.k [at] gmail.com State University “Kyiv Aviation Institute”
Kyiv, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First published on this website: 01.07.2026 - 17:13
Abstract 

Pipelines are essential for energy supply stability. However, many of them face both natural and anthropogenic hazards. For pipeline hazard assessment, remote sensing provides regular, large-scale analysis, especially in hard-to-access areas. Cloud-based platforms like Google Earth Engine (GEE) enable efficient processing of large geospatial datasets. Also, GEE allows creating a web application with a custom GUI for specific thematic tasks. Thus, the aim of this study is to develop a GEE-based web application for automated pipeline hazard assessment utilizing multi-source remote sensing data. The proposed framework incorporates both natural and infrastructure parameter groups. The natural group includes terrain slope from SRTM V3, land surface temperature from MODIS, and accumulated precipitation from ERA5-Land. The infrastructure group consists of distance layers to roads, railways, and power transmission lines. Processing of this data implies normalization of input parameters and computing their weighted sum with expert-defined weighted coefficients. For the experiment, the developed application was tested on a section of the Urengoy–Pomary–Uzhgorod pipeline in the mountainous terrain of the Ukrainian Carpathians. As a result, the obtained pipeline hazard map indicates the following distribution of hazard classes: 13.93% low hazard, 49.11% medium hazard, 34.50% high hazard, and 2.46% very high hazard. For validation, the obtained map was overlaid with 198 documented landslides. The analysis demonstrated high consistency, since most landslides occurred within the high and very high hazard zones. Thus, the developed tool can support spatial decision-making for pipeline monitoring and hazard mitigation.

References 

Apostolov, A. A., Yelistratova, L. A., Romanciuc, I. F., & Zakharchuk, I. (2021). Identifying potential landslide areas by employing the erosion relief index and meteorological criteria in Ukraine. Revue Roumaine de Géographie / Romanian Journal of Geography, 65(2), 125–141. http://www.rjgeo.ro/issues/revue%20roumaine%2065_2/apostolov%20et%20al..pdf

 

Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R., Duren, R., Hensley, S., Kobrick, M., Paller, M., Rodriguez, E., Roth, L., Seal, D., Shaffer, S., Shimada, J., Umland, J., Werner, M., Oskin, M., Burbank, D., & Alsdorf, D. (2007). The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. Reviews of Geophysics, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005rg000183

 

Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031

 

Mahmoud, A. A., & Hasan, R. (2025). A comprehensive survey on pipeline monitoring technologies: advancements, challenges, market opportunities and future directions. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2025.100353

 

Muñoz Sabater, J. (2019). ERA5-Land hourly data from 1950 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.e2161bac

 

Popov, M. O., Тopolnytskyi, М. V., Titarenko, O. V., Stankevich, S. Α., & Аndreiev, А. A. (2020). Forecasting gas and oil potential of subsoil plots via co-analysis of satellite, geological, geophysical and geochemical information by means of subjective logic. WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER RESEARCH, 8, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.37394/232018.2020.8.11

 

Popov, M., Stankevich, S., Kozlova, A., Piestova, I., Lubskiy, M., Titarenko, O., Svideniuk, M., Andreiev, A., Lysenko, A., & Singh, S. K. (2021). Long-Term satellite data time series analysis for land degradation mapping to support sustainable land management in Ukraine. In Advances in geographical and environmental sciences (pp. 165–189). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4768-0_11

 

Shtohryn, L., Anikeyev, S., Kuzmenko, E., & Bagriy, S. (2021). Reflection of the activity of landslide processes in the regional gravitational and magnetic fields (on the example of the Transcarpathian region). GEODYNAMICS, 1(30)2021(1(30)), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2021.01.065

 

Silva, A., Evangelista, L., Ferreira, C., Valença, J., & Mendes, M. P. (2024). Towards resilient pipeline infrastructure: lessons learned from failure analysis. Discover Applied Sciences, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06273-7

 

Titarenko, O., Andreiev, A., Artiushyn, L., & Bondarenko, A. (2026). Integrated geospatial assessment of geodynamic hazard along the pipelines in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.24028/gj.v48i2.353442

 

Wan, Z., Hook, S., & Hulley, G. (2021). MODIS/Terra Land Surface Temperature/Emissivity 8-Day L3 Global 1km SIN Grid V061 [Dataset]. In Earth Observing System Data and Information System. https://doi.org/10.5067/modis/mod11a2.061

 

Zhang, H., Feng, Q., Yan, B., Zheng, X., Yang, Y., Chen, J., Zhang, H., & Liu, X. (2023). State of the art of oil and gas pipeline vulnerability assessments. Energies, 16(8), 3439. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083439