Обзор статьи, представленной на конференцию

Approval status: Accept without remarks
Date Published: 12.05.2021 - 09:55
The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article? 
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished? 
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area? 
Does the article contain new and not published results? 
Was the article clearly written and easily understood? 
Easily understood
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research 
The references are full and grounded? 
How adequate was the writing and used terminology? 
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article 

The topic of these studies is extremely relevant. The scientific substantiation of the degree of protective properties of different types of face masks is carried out. The most modern laboratory devices are used for this purpose. The formulation of the experiment is significantly close to real conditions.
An important issue in assessing the protective properties of face masks is to determine their dynamics over time. In addition, an interesting question is - by what percentage increases the protective properties of each subsequent layer in the most commonly used surgical or tissue masks.

I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article. 
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.